On 23/06/2017 20:19, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
On Jun 19 2017 or thereabouts, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:59:33PM +0800, Phil Reid wrote:
Add a call to of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert when a i2c adapter is registered
so the the smbalert driver can be registered.
Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CCing Benjamin
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index d2402bb..626471b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/i2c-smbus.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
@@ -2045,6 +2046,9 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
dev_warn(&adap->dev,
"Failed to create compatibility class link\n");
#endif
+ res = of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert(adap);
+ if (res)
+ goto out_list;
See my concerns in patch 4/10.
In addition, shouldn't this be placed before device_register() for the
least? pm_runtime_enable() would require a matching pm_runtime_disable(),
and device_register() some unregistering behavior too.
G'day Ben,
Thanks for the review.
Yes this makes sense. I tried having it before the device_register and I get an error
about a kobject not being initialised in the a call from of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert.
Having a look at what I'm doing in of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert now I'm not sure there's
a need to bail out on an error now. Originally I was registering the irq in the setup call.
Which need to handle probe defer. Now this should be handled in the alert probe call.
WDYR?
--
Regards
Phil Reid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
