Hi Sylwester,
On 25-06-2017 22:13, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 06/20/2017 07:26 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> This is an initial submission for the Synopsys Designware HDMI RX
>> Controller Driver. This driver interacts with a phy driver so that
>> a communication between them is created and a video pipeline is
>> configured.
>> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Carlos Palminha <palminha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Changes from v3:
>> - Use v4l2 async API (Sylwester)
>> - Do not block waiting for phy
>> - Do not use busy waiting delays (Sylwester)
>> - Simplify dw_hdmi_power_on (Sylwester)
>> - Use clock API (Sylwester)
>> - Use compatible string (Sylwester)
>> - Minor fixes (Sylwester)
>> Changes from v2:
>> - Address review comments from Hans regarding CEC
>> - Use CEC notifier
>> - Enable SCDC
>> Changes from v1:
>> - Add support for CEC
>> - Correct typo errors
>> - Correctly detect interlaced video modes
>> - Correct VIC parsing
>> Changes from RFC:
>> - Add support for HDCP 1.4
>> - Fixup HDMI_VIC not being parsed (Hans)
>> - Send source change signal when powering off (Hans)
>> - Add a "wait stable delay"
>> - Detect interlaced video modes (Hans)
>> - Restrain g/s_register from reading/writing to HDCP regs (Hans)
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/Kconfig | 15 +
>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx.c | 1862 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx.h | 441 ++++++++
>> include/media/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx-pdata.h | 97 ++
>> 5 files changed, 2416 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx.h
>> create mode 100644 include/media/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx-pdata.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx.c b/drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..22ee51d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/dwc/dw-hdmi-rx.c
>> +static const struct of_device_id dw_hdmi_supported_phys[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-phy-e405", .data = DW_PHY_E405_DRVNAME, },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct device_node *dw_hdmi_get_phy_of_node(struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev,
>> + const struct of_device_id **found_id)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *child = NULL;
>> + const struct of_device_id *id;
>> +
>> + for_each_child_of_node(dw_dev->of_node, child) {
>> + id = of_match_node(dw_hdmi_supported_phys, child);
>> + if (id)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (found_id)
>> + *found_id = id;
>> +
>> + return child;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_hdmi_phy_init(struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_phy_pdata *phy = &dw_dev->phy_config;
>> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>> + struct of_dev_auxdata lookup;
> struct of_dev_auxdata lookup = { };
>
> You could initialize to 0 here and...
>
>> + struct device_node *child;
>> + const char *drvname;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + child = dw_hdmi_get_phy_of_node(dw_dev, &of_id);
>> + if (!child || !of_id || !of_id->data) {
>> + dev_err(dw_dev->dev, "no supported phy found in DT\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + drvname = of_id->data;
>> + phy->funcs = &dw_hdmi_phy_funcs;
>> + phy->funcs_arg = dw_dev;
>> +
>> + lookup.compatible = (char *)of_id->compatible;
>> + lookup.phys_addr = 0x0;
>> + lookup.name = NULL;
> ...drop these two assignments.
Ok.
>
>> + lookup.platform_data = phy;
>> +
>> + request_module(drvname);
> I'd say this request_module() is not needed when you use the v4l2-async
> subnotifiers and the modules are properly installed in the file system.
> I might be missing something though.
Hmm, well I didn't actually test without request_module but I
think its needed, otherwise I would have to do:
modprobe phy_module
modprobe controller_module
With request_module I just have to do:
modprobe controller_module
>
>> + ret = of_platform_populate(dw_dev->of_node, NULL, &lookup, dw_dev->dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dw_dev->dev, "failed to populate phy driver\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_hdmi_phy_exit(struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev)
>> +{
>> + of_platform_depopulate(dw_dev->dev);
>> +}
>> +static int dw_hdmi_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev = to_dw_dev(sd);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = cec_register_adapter(dw_dev->cec_adap, dw_dev->dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dw_dev->dev, "failed to register CEC adapter\n");
>> + cec_delete_adapter(dw_dev->cec_adap);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cec_register_cec_notifier(dw_dev->cec_adap, dw_dev->cec_notifier);
>> + dw_dev->registered = true;
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_hdmi_unregistered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev = to_dw_dev(sd);
>> +
>> + cec_unregister_adapter(dw_dev->cec_adap);
>> + cec_notifier_put(dw_dev->cec_notifier);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct v4l2_subdev_internal_ops dw_hdmi_internal_ops = {
>> + .registered = dw_hdmi_registered,
>> + .unregistered = dw_hdmi_unregistered,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int dw_hdmi_v4l2_notify_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>> + struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev = notifier_to_dw_dev(notifier);
>> +
>> + if (dw_dev->phy_async_sd.match.fwnode.fwnode ==
>> + of_fwnode_handle(subdev->dev->of_node)) {
>> + dev_dbg(dw_dev->dev, "found new subdev '%s'\n", subdev->name);
>> + dw_dev->phy_sd = subdev;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_hdmi_v4l2_notify_unbind(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>> + struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev = notifier_to_dw_dev(notifier);
>> +
>> + if (dw_dev->phy_sd == subdev) {
>> + dev_dbg(dw_dev->dev, "unbinding '%s'\n", subdev->name);
>> + dw_dev->phy_sd = NULL;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_hdmi_v4l2_notify_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev = notifier_to_dw_dev(notifier);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = v4l2_device_register_subdev_nodes(&dw_dev->v4l2_dev);
> There shouldn't be multiple struct v4l2_device instances, instead we should
> have only one created by the main driver. AFAIU, in your case it would be
> driver associated with the dw-hdmi-soc DT node. And normally such a top level
> driver creates subdev device nodes when its all required sub-devices are
> available.
>
> I think this patch could be useful for you:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.linuxtv.org_patch_41834&d=DwICaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=WHDsc6kcWAl4i96Vm5hJ_19IJiuxx_p_Rzo2g-uHDKw&m=VfuOK5-A8h_JQk0lk74o48aav0T2PnwxhIr2sauw46Y&s=0GuG3FNbkmfVVMYQuP-Ed6zY9PnXnw7S4KgQhG52JF4&e=
>
> With that the dw-hdmi-soc driver would have it's v4l2-async notifier's
> notify_complete() callback called only when both the hdmi-rx and the
> hdmi-phy subdevs are registered.
Yeah, I saw the patches. I just implemented this way because they
are not merged yet, right?
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dw_dev->dev, "failed to register subdev nodes\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +static int dw_hdmi_parse_dt(struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev)
>> +{
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(dw_dev->clk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dw_dev->dev, "failed to enable cfg-clk\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dw_dev->cfg_clk = clk_get_rate(dw_dev->clk) / 1000000;
> 1000000U ?
Ok.
>
>> + if (!dw_dev->cfg_clk) {
>> + dev_err(dw_dev->dev, "invalid cfg-clk frequency\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto err_clk;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_clk:
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(dw_dev->clk);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_hdmi_rx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + /* V4L2 initialization */
>> + sd = &dw_dev->sd;
>> + v4l2_subdev_init(sd, &dw_hdmi_sd_ops);
>> + strlcpy(sd->name, dev_name(dev), sizeof(sd->name));
>> + sd->dev = dev;
>> + sd->internal_ops = &dw_hdmi_internal_ops;
>> + sd->flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS;
> Don't you also need V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE flag set?
Ouch. Yes I need otherwise the subdev will not be associated with
the v4l2_device.
>
>> + /* Notifier for subdev binding */
>> + ret = dw_hdmi_v4l2_init_notifier(dw_dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init v4l2 notifier\n");
>> + goto err_v4l2_dev;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Phy loading */
> s/Phy/PHY/ ?
Ok.
>
>> + ret = dw_hdmi_phy_init(dw_dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_v4l2_notifier;
>> +
>> + ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(sd);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register subdev\n");
>> + goto err_cec;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Fill initial format settings */
>> + dw_dev->timings = timings_def;
>> + dw_dev->mbus_code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_BGR888_1X24;
>> +
>> + /* All done */
> This comment seems unneeded.
Ok.
>
>> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, sd);
>> + dw_dev->state = HDMI_STATE_POWER_OFF;
>> + dw_hdmi_detect_tx_5v(dw_dev);
>> + dev_info(dev, "driver probed\n");
> dev_dbg()
Ok.
>
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_cec:
>> + cec_delete_adapter(dw_dev->cec_adap);
>> +err_phy:
>> + dw_hdmi_phy_exit(dw_dev);
>> +err_v4l2_notifier:
>> + v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&dw_dev->v4l2_notifier);
>> +err_v4l2_dev:
>> + v4l2_device_unregister(&dw_dev->v4l2_dev);
>> +err_wq:
>> + destroy_workqueue(dw_dev->wq);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_hdmi_rx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct dw_hdmi_dev *dw_dev = to_dw_dev(sd);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>> +
>> + dw_hdmi_disable_ints(dw_dev);
>> + dw_hdmi_disable_hpd(dw_dev);
>> + dw_hdmi_disable_scdc(dw_dev);
>> + dw_hdmi_power_off(dw_dev);
>> + dw_hdmi_phy_s_power(dw_dev, false);
>> + flush_workqueue(dw_dev->wq);
>> + destroy_workqueue(dw_dev->wq);
>> + v4l2_device_unregister(&dw_dev->v4l2_dev);
>> + dw_hdmi_phy_exit(dw_dev);
>> + v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(sd);
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(dw_dev->clk);
>> + dev_info(dev, "driver removed\n");
> dev_dbg()
Ok.
Thanks for the review!
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id dw_hdmi_rx_id[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-rx" },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dw_hdmi_rx_id);
> --
> Regards,
> Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
