On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 17:14 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:56:05PM +0800, Sean Wang wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 19:22 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > + return (regval & info->desc.enable_mask) ? > > > > + REGULATOR_STATUS_ON : REGULATOR_STATUS_OFF; > > > > This isn't really a get_status() operation - it's just showing the > > > status of the enable we set. The get_status() operation is for hardware > > > that has a mechanism for reading back the current physical status of the > > > regulator, usually including things like if it's in regulation or not. > > > > Also please write normal conditional statements, it helps people read > > > the code. > > > for the hardware, the way for reflect the current physical physical > > has to depend on the bit reading as the bit we enable. It indeed tends > > to confuse other users and developers, we maybe can add some comments > > for this to avoid. > > It's OK to just not have a get_status() operation - a lot of regulators > just can't do this and that's fine, the subsystem will cope. > understood. it seems to be better with subsystem coping. we'll remove get_status callback. > > > > +static const struct of_device_id mt6380_of_match[] = { > > > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6380-regulator", }, > > > > + { /* sentinel */ }, > > > > +}; > > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6380_of_match); > > > > Given that this driver is entirely specific to the parent PMIC there > > > should be no need for a separate compatible string, it's redundant. > > > the parent of pmic is MediaTek pwrap which is possibly being used with > > various pmics such as MT6323, MT6797, MT6380 and so on. So extra > > matching we thought is required to identify which pmic is actually being > > connected. > > > For those opinions, maybe we didn't get your exact point. If something > > is wrong, please kindly guide us to the right place. > > It sounds like pwrap should be a bus rather than using a platform device > here? But I guess that's how things are for now so OK. yes, it is a bus , a proprietary bus, which is something like encapsulation of spi and there's some protocol running on this between master/slave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html