On 06/22/2017 05:12 PM, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
Add flexibility on supported resolutions by cropping sensor
image to fit user resolution format request.
Signed-off-by: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c b/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c
index 75d53aa..bc5e052 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c
@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ struct stm32_dcmi {
struct v4l2_async_notifier notifier;
struct dcmi_graph_entity entity;
struct v4l2_format fmt;
+ struct v4l2_rect crop;
+ bool do_crop;
const struct dcmi_format **user_formats;
unsigned int num_user_formats;
@@ -538,6 +540,27 @@ static int dcmi_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count)
if (dcmi->bus.flags & V4L2_MBUS_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING)
val |= CR_PCKPOL;
+ if (dcmi->do_crop) {
+ u32 size, start;
+
+ /* Crop resolution */
+ size = ((dcmi->crop.height - 1) << 16) |
+ ((dcmi->crop.width << 1) - 1);
+ reg_write(dcmi->regs, DCMI_CWSIZE, size);
+
+ /* Crop start point */
+ start = ((dcmi->crop.top) << 16) |
+ ((dcmi->crop.left << 1));
+ reg_write(dcmi->regs, DCMI_CWSTRT, start);
+
+ dev_dbg(dcmi->dev, "Cropping to %ux%u@%u:%u\n",
+ dcmi->crop.width, dcmi->crop.height,
+ dcmi->crop.left, dcmi->crop.top);
+
+ /* Enable crop */
+ val |= CR_CROP;
+ };
+
reg_write(dcmi->regs, DCMI_CR, val);
/* Enable dcmi */
@@ -707,6 +730,8 @@ static int dcmi_try_fmt(struct stm32_dcmi *dcmi, struct v4l2_format *f,
.which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY,
};
int ret;
+ __u32 width, height;
+ struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf = &format.format;
dcmi_fmt = find_format_by_fourcc(dcmi, pixfmt->pixelformat);
if (!dcmi_fmt) {
@@ -724,8 +749,18 @@ static int dcmi_try_fmt(struct stm32_dcmi *dcmi, struct v4l2_format *f,
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ /* Align format on what sensor can do */
+ width = pixfmt->width;
+ height = pixfmt->height;
v4l2_fill_pix_format(pixfmt, &format.format);
+ /* We can do any resolution thanks to crop */
+ if ((mf->width > width) || (mf->height > height)) {
+ /* Restore width/height */
+ pixfmt->width = width;
+ pixfmt->height = height;
+ };
+
pixfmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
pixfmt->bytesperline = pixfmt->width * dcmi_fmt->bpp;
pixfmt->sizeimage = pixfmt->bytesperline * pixfmt->height;
@@ -741,6 +776,8 @@ static int dcmi_set_fmt(struct stm32_dcmi *dcmi, struct v4l2_format *f)
struct v4l2_subdev_format format = {
.which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE,
};
+ struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *mf = &format.format;
+ struct v4l2_pix_format *pixfmt = &f->fmt.pix;
const struct dcmi_format *current_fmt;
int ret;
@@ -748,13 +785,28 @@ static int dcmi_set_fmt(struct stm32_dcmi *dcmi, struct v4l2_format *f)
if (ret)
return ret;
- v4l2_fill_mbus_format(&format.format, &f->fmt.pix,
+ v4l2_fill_mbus_format(&format.format, pixfmt,
current_fmt->mbus_code);
ret = v4l2_subdev_call(dcmi->entity.subdev, pad,
set_fmt, NULL, &format);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ /* Enable crop if sensor resolution is larger than request */
+ dcmi->do_crop = false;
+ if ((mf->width > pixfmt->width) || (mf->height > pixfmt->height)) {
+ dcmi->crop.width = pixfmt->width;
+ dcmi->crop.height = pixfmt->height;
+ dcmi->crop.left = (mf->width - pixfmt->width) / 2;
+ dcmi->crop.top = (mf->height - pixfmt->height) / 2;
+ dcmi->do_crop = true;
Why not implement the selection API instead? I assume that you can crop from any
region of the sensor, not just the center part.
Regards,
Hans
+
+ dev_dbg(dcmi->dev, "%ux%u cropped to %ux%u@(%u,%u)\n",
+ mf->width, mf->height,
+ dcmi->crop.width, dcmi->crop.height,
+ dcmi->crop.left, dcmi->crop.top);
+ };
+
dcmi->fmt = *f;
dcmi->current_fmt = current_fmt;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
