Hi! > >> But as Pavel pointed out, in fact we are missing many > >> Acks still, for all of the dts source changes (patches > >> 4-14), as well as really everything else (imx-media staging > >> driver patches). > > > > No Acks needed for the staging part. It's staging, so not held > > to the same standards as non-staging parts. That doesn't mean > > Acks aren't welcome, of course. > > Acks are wanted for particular i.MX DTS changes including device > tree binding descriptions. > > Shawn, please bless the series. Hmm. I changed the subject to grab Shawn's attetion. But his acks should not be needed for forward progress. Yes, it would be good, but he does not react -- so just reorder the series so that dts changes come last, then apply the parts you can apply: driver can go in. And actually... if maintainer does not respond at all, there are ways to deal with that, too... Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
