frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx writes: > From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx> > > Remove "phandle", "linux,phandle", and "ibm,phandle" properties from > the internal device tree. The phandle will still be in the struct > device_node phandle field. > > This is to resolve the issue found by Stephen Boyd [1] when he changed > the type of struct property.value from void * to const void *. As > a result of the type change, the overlay code had compile errors > where the resolver updates phandle values. > > [1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1702.1/04160.html > > - Add sysfs infrastructure to report np->phandle, as if it was a property. > - Do not create "phandle" "ibm,phandle", and "linux,phandle" properties > in the expanded device tree. > - Remove phandle properties in of_attach_node(), for nodes dynamically > attached to the live tree. Add the phandle sysfs entry for these nodes. > - When creating an overlay changeset, duplicate the node phandle in > __of_node_dup(). > - Remove no longer needed checks to exclude "phandle" and "linux,phandle" > properties in several locations. > - A side effect of these changes is that the obsolete "linux,phandle" and > "ibm,phandle" properties will no longer appear in /proc/device-tree (they > will appear as "phandle"). > - A side effect is that the value of property "ibm,phandle" will no longer > override the value of properties "phandle" and "linux,phandle". Can you please Cc linuxppc-dev in future on patches which clearly are going to impact powerpc? cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
