On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote:
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote:
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote:
From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add MT2701 i2c device node.
Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
[...]
Dear Matthias,
Could you take this patch together with
[PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ?
Thanks!
They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss
something?
Regards,
Matthias
[1]
https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2
[2]
https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
Dear Matthias,
Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]?
"mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
"mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
"mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
"mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
"mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
Thanks!
You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding
description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx?
Regards,
Matthias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
