Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12.01.2014 19:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

Could we get some more descriptive names for the domains?

They are listed like this in user's manual, e.g. DOMAIN_F, DOMAIN_I,
DOMAIN_G, etc.

I guessed so. So the manual sucks. Would it be feasible to get it more
descriptive (like "Domain_G (GPU)")?

Does the name really matter that much? I changed original ones in this patch simply to make it easier to grep for domain related messages in kernel output (e.g. dmesg | grep domain). It was not the main part of this patch.

Also, there are multiple devices in most domains, so that would rather end up being "Domain_I (JPEG, Cam I/F)", "Domain_P (2D, TV Enc., Scaler)", "Domain_F (Rot, Post, LCD)".

If you really insist, I can change this, but I fail to see what effect it would really have.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux