Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio: use "output-active" and "output-inactive" for gpio-hogs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  - input:      A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as input.
> -- output-low  A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output with
> -             the value low.
> -- output-high A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output with
> -             the value high.
> +- output-inactive: A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output
> +             using the inactive level as value.
> +- output-active: A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output
> +             using the active level as value.
> +- output-low  A deprecated alias for "output-inactive".
> +- output-high A deprecated alias for "output-active".

Wouldn't "output-asserted" / "output-deasserted" be more to the point?

If the majority prefers "active" I can live with that too.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux