On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:23:28AM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 00:27 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > > > I think you should split the binding documentation and clk changes into > > > separate > > > patches. > > > > OK, from what I know is that for "trivial" changes the driver and > > dt-binding changes can go through one patch. > > this patch started as a four-line patch which added two lines of > > documentation and two lines of driver code. > > I'm not aware of such tolerance but if you've have seen that the DT maintainers > are OK with it, feel free to point me to it. > > Last time I heard about it, DT guys were using filter-branch on the kernel tree > to create a separate tree, so I was thinking that this "documentation as a > separate patch" was a hard rule ... but I may be wrong That is one of the reasons, but there is no hard rule. It's not worth a respin just for that either. Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
