On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 14:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c > > index 998316bf2dad..ecdcba9d1220 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c > > @@ -183,8 +183,9 @@ void opal_event_shutdown(void) > > + /* It's not an error for the names to be missing */ > > + of_property_read_string_array(opal_node, "opal-interrupts-names", > > + names, opal_irq_count); > > Just double-checking, as it's different from the standard "interrupt-names": > is "opal-interrupts-names" the correct name? Yes, because the property it refers to isn't a standard "interrupts" property... it's ... complicated :-) It could have been mind you, but the decision for that was made years ago... it's a bunch of interrupts OPAL is interested in, which Linux requests and sets up a handler for which just calls back into OPAL. In any case, firmwares with that property are out now. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
