Hi, Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@xxxxxxx> writes: >> Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> -- >> >> >> 1.7.9.5 >> >> > Hi, Balbi and all guys, >> >> > Any comment for these patches? Can they be accepted? >> >> >> >> Rob had comments which you didn't reply yet. I cannot take this >> >> patchset yet ;-) >> >> >> > Balbi, >> > >> > I look into his mail again, which was based v3, and I replied it. >> > >> > He had different understanding for undefined length burst mode. >> > >> > It seems he think for this mode, just setting bit[0] (INCRBrstEna) and >> > don't need to set other field. >> > >> > However, according to the DWC USB3.0 controller databook, when it is >> > undefined length INCR burst mode, we still need to set one max burst >> > type, such as INCR8, which means controller will use any length less >> > than or equal to this INCR8. >> >> Rob, do you agree with the patch now? >> >> -- >> balbi > > Hi, Balbi, > Any comment for these patches? Or any chance to merge them? I'm not sure you understand how development is carried out here. I *can't* apply patches touching Device Tree properties without an Acked-by from any of the Device Tree maintainers. Until then, there's nothing I can say/do. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
