On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 07:57:12PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> (Adding DT reviewers)
>
> On 01/09/14 03:04, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:59:40PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> >> +static int krait_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> >> +{
> >> + u32 id = read_cpuid_id() & 0xffffff00;
> >> +
> >> + armv7pmu_init(cpu_pmu);
> >> + cpu_pmu->name = "ARMv7 Krait";
> >> + /* Some early versions of Krait don't support PC write events */
> >> + if (id == 0x511f0400 || id == 0x510f0600)
> >> + cpu_pmu->map_event = krait_map_event_no_branch;
> > Hmm, I'd really rather this information came via the DT. In fact, you could
> > just drop the branch event from your main map_event_function and keep things
> > simple. It depends how badly you want to advertise it in perf list :)
> >
>
> Not every version of Krait is missing support for this event, so I'd
> like to keep it so things like perf stat show branch counts. How about I
> add a bool property to the pmu node indicating that this PMU is missing
> support for the PC write events? Something like "no-pc-write"?
Perhaps, although I think it should be qualcomm-specific, so something like
"qcom,krait-no-pc-write"? Again, I'd be glad to hear something from a DT
reviewer on this.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
