Quoting Rob Herring (2017-05-31 07:23:58) > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:08:16AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Gregory CLEMENT > > <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On mar., mai 23 2017, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >> Please rebase and resend the rest of the patches. > > > > > > Actually I was wrong with my assumption that there was no dependency. > > > For the binding documentation there is dependecy accross the series I > > > sent. > > > > > > This patch depends on "pinctrl: dt-bindings: add documentation for AP806 > > > pin controllers" [1] and "pinctrl: dt-bindings: add documentation for > > > CP110 pin controllers" [3] from the series "Add support for the pin > > > controllers on the Marvell Armada 7K/8K". > > > > > > As you are maintainer of both gpio and pinctrl subsystem it will be easy > > > to resolv. > > > > Please send all patches in one big series in that case, so I can apply > > them all to a branch and merge that branch into both trees. > > > > > But these last patches depend also on "clk: mvebu: ap806: introduce a > > > new binding" [3] in the clock series "Improve ap806 clk support on > > > Marvell Armada 7K/8K" and on "clk: mvebu: cp110: introduce a new > > > binding" [4] in the clock series "Improve cp110 clk support on Marvell > > > Armada 7K/8K". > > > > That sounds messy. > > > > > So for these particular patches, either I rebase them on the v4.12-rc2 > > > and there will be a small merge conflict during the merge window for > > > v4.13, or we can ask a stable branch with only these few patches (I am > > > adding the clock maintainer to this email). > > > > > > If we chose this last option I can split the clock patches to have patch > > > modifying only the binding documentation. > > > > I think you can make a patch just modifying the binding documentation > > and then apply that patch to *both* trees, just make sure the patch > > is *final* and not applied in different versions in clk and pinctrl. > > I thought we try to avoid doing that. > > > I think cross-tree branches for documentation clashes is too much > > bureaucracy. > > I can just take all the doc patches separately. Or you can take the > clock one too. Stephen and I have started making a -dt branch for each new clk driver which. This stable branch has only the dt bindings/headers in it (no driver code). I'll make such a branch for ap806 this week and everyone can merge that in as a dep. Regards, Mike > > > Make sure your clock patch is finalized and preferably also applied > > to the clk tree then put it in the bottom of the patch set you send > > to me as well and I will proceed like above. > > > > Yours, > > Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
