Hi Wim, I rebased this patch series on Kukjin's for-next branch. That is the reason for missing this context code in the patch. As this is a dts file change and if Kukjin accepts to merge this patch into your "linux-watchdog-next" tree you can rebase and apply it. Best Wishes, Leela Krishna. ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Wim Van Sebroeck<wim@xxxxxxxxx> Date : Jan 10, 2014 13:11 (GMT+05:30) Title : Re: [PATCH V12 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files Hi Leela, > This patch adds pmusysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files to > handle PMU register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver > > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson > Tested-by: Doug Anderson > --- ... > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > index b1fa334..cd47db0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi > @@ -402,4 +402,9 @@ > clock-names = "gscl"; > samsung,power-domain = <&gsc_pd>; > }; I can't add this patch since there is no "gscl" in the current linux-tree. Is this depending on another patch or are we going to fix this in another way? Kind regards, Wim. Best Wishes, Leela Krishna.ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·?zøœzÚÞ{ø§¶›¡Ü¨}©ž²Æ zÚ&j:+v‰¨þø¯ù®w¥þŠà2ŠÞ™¨èÚ&¢)ß¡«a¶Úÿÿûàz¿äz¹Þ—ú+ƒùšŽŠÝ¢jÿŠwèþf