On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:59 AM CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote: >On Tue 23 May 09:58 PDT 2017, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Friday, May 19, 2017 10:08:24 PM CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Thu 18 May 11:38 PDT 2017, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 1:07:29 PM CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > > On Wed 10 May 04:27 PDT 2017, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ipq4019.c > > > > > b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ipq4019.c > > > > > index 743d1f458205..7219d1e33c71 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ipq4019.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ipq4019.c > > > > > + qca_mux_rmii0_refclk, > > > > > + qca_mux_wifi0_rfsilient0, > > > > > + qca_mux_wifi1_rfsilient0, > > > > > + qca_mux_smart2, > > > > > + qca_mux_led4, > > > > > > > > What drives ledX? Is it 11 different LED controllers or is it a > > > > single LED controller with 11 outputs. > > > > > > The latter. The IPQ40xx have one LED controller @ 0x1937000. > > > According to the driver (leds-ipq40xx.c in the SDK), it does > > > control up to 11 LEDs. A LED can either be muxed to one of the > > > hardware sources (wifi, lan or wan-ports activity/linkspeed), or > > > it can be operated by one of four software-programmable "blink" > > > sources (each with a variable blink rate and duty cycle). > > > The driver labels each LED as "ipq40xx::led%d". > > > > > > > As they all stem from the same hardware block I suggest we name the > > function "led". > > This is going to be a problem for Pin 36: > > PINGROUP(36, rmii0, *led2*, *led0*, NA, ...) > > I checked the other pins too, but this seems to be the only time two > LED-lines share the same pin. What's the recommended/prefered option > in this case? Something like led_alt, or should I keep the led0-led11? > > There are a few more collisions with other functions as well: > smartX, i2s_*, wifi1_uart*: > >Looks like we're stuck with individually named functions for these then... > PINGROUP(58, qpic, led2, blsp_i2c0, *smart3*, *smart1*, > i2s_rx_mclk, NA, wcss0_dbg, tm4, wifi0, wifi1, NA, NA, NA), > > PINGROUP(60, qpic, blsp_uart0, smart1, smart3, led0, > *i2s_tx_bclk*, *i2s_rx_bclk*, atest_char, NA, wcss0_dbg, > qdss_traceclk_a, NA, tm6, NA), > > PINGROUP(61, qpic, blsp_uart0, *smart1*, *smart3*, led1, *i2s_tx_fsync*, > *i2s_rx_fsync*, NA, NA, wcss0_dbg, qdss_cti_trig_out_a0, > NA, tm7, NA), > > PINGROUP(63, qpic, wifi0_uart1, *wifi1_uart1*, *wifi1_uart*, *i2s_td1*, > *i2s_rxd*, *i2s_spdif_out*, *i2s_spdif_in*, NA, wcss0_dbg, > wcss1_dbg, NA, tm, NA), > ... >This makes me wonder what wifi1_uart (and uart1) actually is... >The wifi\d_uart seems to have 5 pins in its group and wifi\d_uart\d seems to be two sets of two pins. So perhaps this is some alternative routing and wifi0_uart0 and wifi0_uart1 is actually the same function? >@Ram, can you help us out here? wifi0_uart0 and wifi0_uart1 are different functions, and they are mapped as below: wifi0_uart --> wifi0 uart RTS wifi0_uart0 --> wifi0 uart RxD wifi0_uart1 --> wifi0 uart CTS wifi1_uart --> wifi1 uart TxD wifi1_uart0 --> wifi1 uart RxD wifi1_uart1 --> wifi1 uart CTS Thanks, Ram > > > > > + qca_mux_qpic_pad4, > > > > > > > > Please keep an eye on the ipq8074 patch from Varadarajan and > > > > make this follow the same scheme. > > > Ok, I'll wait for how qca8074 plays out then. > > <https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg582958.html>: > | On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > | [...] > | > If you consider that you are defining the available functions for > | > this pinmuxer and then define the sets of pins exposing these > | > available functions it does make sense to just name it "qpic". > | > > | > I think that naming them _common, _lcd and _nand is just adding > | > confusion when it comes to writing the dts files. > | > > | > @Linus, do you have a different preference here? > | > |No I pretty much trust the driver maintainer to know this best. > | > |Yours, > |Linus Walleij > > Thanks for the answer, I'll go with "qpic" then. > I'll also combine the various sdio_* to sdio and look at the other > candidates (rgmii*, rmii0/1*, pmuX, pcie_clk*, jtag*, tmX, > audio_pwmX). Unless someone comes up with a good reason not to. > >Sounds good! >Regards, >Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
