On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 01:58:05PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Am 10.05.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Stefan Wahren: > > Instead of returning the requested baudrate, we better return the > > actual one because it isn't always the same. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c > > index 487c88f..2cfdf34 100644 > > --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c > > @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static unsigned int ttyport_set_baudrate(struct serdev_controller *ctrl, unsigne > > > > /* tty_set_termios() return not checked as it is always 0 */ > > tty_set_termios(tty, &ktermios); > > - return speed; > > + return ktermios.c_ospeed; > > } > > > > static void ttyport_set_flow_control(struct serdev_controller *ctrl, bool enable) > > there is no dependency to this series. I would be happy if this could be > applied, so i don't have to carry it for the next version. Ok, I'll take it now. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
