RE: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add imx7ulp pinctrl binding doc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 8:59 PM
> To: A.S. Dong
> Cc: Mark Rutland; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andy Duan; Jacky Bai;
> linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; stefan@xxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rob
> Herring; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add imx7ulp pinctrl binding
> doc
> 
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:41:09PM +0000, A.S. Dong wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:06:19PM +0000, A.S. Dong wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> > > > > > +* Freescale i.MX7ULP IOMUX Controller
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +Please refer to fsl,imx-pinctrl.txt in this directory for
> > > > > > +common binding part and usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are imx7ulp-pinctrl bindings more alike to fsl,imx-pinctrl.txt
> > > > > or generic pinctrl-bindings.txt?  My personal feeling is that it
> > > > > might be better to take pinctrl-bindings.txt as the reference
> > > > > base and highlight how imx7ulp- pinctrl bindings differ from it.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It seems still more like fsl,imx-pinctrl.txt.
> > > >
> > > > I know fsl,imx-pinctrl.txt is a bit out of date, especially after
> > > > we add generic pinconf.
> > > >
> > > > I plan to update it later after adding generic pin conf support to
> > > > legacy SoCs (MX6 & 7) as well, do you think it's ok?
> > >
> > > Please do not.  Let's use generic pinconf support only for new SoCs,
> > > and not bother with legacy SoCs.
> > >
> >
> > I wonder there may be some guys interested more in generic Pinconfig
> > format rather than old one when they add new board support, or someone
> > else adding the support for legacy SoCs as the pinctrl-imx core
> > already supports it after this patch series.
> 
> I would take this as an unnecessary churn on existing code and increase of
> maintenance burden.  So that's definitely a NO from me.
> 

Okay, personally I would be with you!

Regards
Dong Aisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux