On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob > Cc Mark > >> > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > It should use same method to get same result. >> > To getting remote-endpoint node, >> > let's use of_graph_get_remote_endpoint() >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > v6 -> v7 >> > >> > - no change >> > >> > drivers/of/base.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- >> > include/linux/of_graph.h | 8 ++++++++ >> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you for your Acked-by. > But, does these mean, Mark (= ALSA SoC maintainer) > can pickup all OF-graph related patches ? Yes, that's usually the easiest way to deal with a series with cross tree dependencies. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
