On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The current function name is a bit confusing, and doesn't really allow to > create an explicit function to reverse the operation. > > We also for now change the parent rate through a pointer, while we don't > return anything. > > In order to be less confusing, and easier to use for downstream users, > change the function name to something hopefully clearer, and return the > adjusted rate instead of changing the pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
