On 2/05/2017 17:57, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2017-05-02 11:12, Phil Reid wrote:
The pca954x device do not have the ability to mask interrupts. For
i2c slave devices that also don't have masking ability (eg ltc1760
smbalert output) delay registering the irq until after the mux
segments have been configured. During the mux add_adaptor call the
core i2c system can register an smbalert handler which would then
be called immediately when the irq is registered. This smbalert
handler will then clear the pending irq.
Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
index ad31d21..4299738 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc)
{
struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
- int c, err, irq;
+ int c, irq;
if (!data->chip->has_irq || client->irq <= 0)
return 0;
@@ -314,24 +314,22 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc)
handle_simple_irq);
}
- err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq, NULL,
- pca954x_irq_handler,
- IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
- "pca954x", data);
- if (err)
- goto err_req_irq;
+ return 0;
+}
- disable_irq(data->client->irq);
+static void pca954x_cleanup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc)
+{
+ struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
+ int c, irq;
- return 0;
-err_req_irq:
- for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) {
- irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c);
- irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
+ if (data->irq) {
+ for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) {
+ irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c);
+ irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
+ }
+ irq_domain_remove(data->irq);
}
- irq_domain_remove(data->irq);
-
- return err;
+ i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc);
}
/*
@@ -422,6 +420,14 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
}
}
+ if (data->chip->has_irq || client->irq > 0) {
This should be && instead of ||. However, I think it's better to not
try to replicate the inverse of the test in pca954x_irq_setup and
instead just check if the irq domain is there with "if (data->irq)".
Assuming that is the intent...
Yeah, that's better.
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq,
+ NULL, pca954x_irq_handler, IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
+ "pca954x", data);
The indentation is horrific. Please fix.
oops
Acked with those two fixed.
I also noticed that there is no check for failure of the call to
irq_create_mapping in pca954x_irq_setup. For bonus points, can you
fix that error path too, please? Or should failure to create those
irq mappings not be fatal for some reason?
Seems reasonable to fail. I'll fix that as well.
Cheers,
peda
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail_del_adapters;
+ }
+
dev_info(&client->dev,
"registered %d multiplexed busses for I2C %s %s\n",
num, data->chip->muxtype == pca954x_ismux
@@ -430,25 +436,15 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return 0;
fail_del_adapters:
- i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc);
+ pca954x_cleanup(muxc);
return ret;
}
static int pca954x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
- struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
- int c, irq;
- if (data->irq) {
- for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) {
- irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c);
- irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
- }
- irq_domain_remove(data->irq);
- }
-
- i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc);
+ pca954x_cleanup(muxc);
return 0;
}
--
Regards
Phil Reid
ElectroMagnetic Imaging Technology Pty Ltd
Development of Geophysical Instrumentation & Software
www.electromag.com.au
3 The Avenue, Midland WA 6056, AUSTRALIA
Ph: +61 8 9250 8100
Fax: +61 8 9250 7100
Email: preid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
