Hi Chris, On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > +ðer { >> > + pinctrl-names = "default"; >> > + pinctrl-0 = <ðer_pins>; >> > + >> > + status = "okay"; >> > + >> > + renesas,no-ether-link; >> > + phy-handle = <&phy0>; >> > + phy0: ethernet-phy@0 { >> > + reg = <0>; >> >> Shouldn't the interrupt (connected to P1_15) be described? > > That interrupt pin from the PHY is not used. It did not need to be connected. But it is connected, according to the schematics. DT describes hardware, not software limitations. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html