On 27-04-17, 16:20, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 04/27/2017 03:12 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > [].. > > >> > >>> At qualcomm, we have an external M3 core (running its own firmware) which controls > >>> a few voltage rails (including AVS on those). The devices vote for the voltage levels > > > > Thanks for explicitly mentioning this, but ... > > > >>> (or performance levels) they need by passing an integer value to the M3 (not actual > > > > you contradict here, is it just voltage or performance(i.e. frequency) > > or both ? We need clarity there to choose the right representation. > > Its just voltage. Right. Its just voltage in this case, but we can't speak of future platforms here and we have to consider this thing as an operating performance point only. I still think that this thread is moving in the right direction, specially after V6 which looks much better. If we have anything strong against the way V6 is trying to solve it, I want to talk about it right now and get inputs from all the parties involved. Scrapping all this work is fine, but I would like to do it ASAP in that case :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
