On 01/07/2014 08:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 January 2014, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> USB Host driver (drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c) expects the 60MHz
>> reference clock to be named "init_60m_fclk". Provide this
>> information.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
>> index 2f12a47..e0ab379 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
>> @@ -765,6 +765,8 @@
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> ranges;
>> + clocks = <&l3init_60m_fclk>;
>> + clock-names = "init_60m_fclk";
>>
>> usbhsohci: ohci@4a064800 {
>> compatible = "ti,ohci-omap3", "usb-ohci";
>
> The bindings/mfd/omap-usb-host.txt file doesn't document any clocks.
> Please create another patch to document the clock names in this binding
> before you start putting them into the dtsi file. So far the clock
> names are an implementation detail of Linux as they are not part
> of the binding, and with your patch it becomes part of the ABI.
>
Right. I'll re-post the series.
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
