On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:26:51PM +0800, icenowy@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 在 2017-04-24 16:51，Maxime Ripard 写道：
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 06:37:45PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > +static const struct of_device_id sunxi_de2_clk_ids[] = {
> > > + {
> > > + .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-de2-clk",
> > > + .data = &sun8i_a83t_de2_clk_desc,
> > > + },
> > > + {
> > > + .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-de2-clk",
> > > + .data = &sun50i_a64_de2_clk_desc,
> > > + },
> > > + /*
> > > + * The Allwinner A64 SoC needs some bit to be poke in syscon to make
> > > + * DE2 really working.
> > > + * So there's currently no A64 compatible here.
> > > + * H5 shares the same reset line with A64, so here H5 is using the
> > > + * clock description of A64.
> > > + */
> > > + { }
> > > +};
> >
> > So that A64 driver would require more than just what you defined in
> > the binding in order to operate?
>
> Yes. When trying to do A64 driver, I will send out first a patch to
> add the needed binding bit.
Then remove the A64 compatible from the binding document.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
