Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 08:06:09 CEST schrieb Gilad Ben-Yossef: Hi Gilad, > > Well, it turns out there is and we do :-) > > This is from crypto/des_generic.c: > > /* > * RFC2451: > * > * For DES-EDE3, there is no known need to reject weak or > * complementation keys. Any weakness is obviated by the use of > * multiple keys. > * > * However, if the first two or last two independent 64-bit keys are > * equal (k1 == k2 or k2 == k3), then the DES3 operation is simply the > * same as DES. Implementers MUST reject keys that exhibit this > * property. > * > */ > int __des3_ede_setkey(u32 *expkey, u32 *flags, const u8 *key, > unsigned int keylen) > > However, this does not check that k1 == k3. In this case DES3 > becomes 2DES (2-keys TDEA), the use of which was dropped post 2015 > by NIST Special Publication 800-131A*. It is correct that the RFC wants at least a 2key 3DES. And it is correct that SP800-131A mandates 3key 3DES post 2015. All I am saying is that FIPS 140-2 does *not* require a technical verification of the 3 keys being not identical. Note, formally, FIPS 140-2 requires that the 3 keys (i.e. all 192 bits) must be obtained from *one* call to a DRBG or KDF (separate independent calls to, say, obtain one key at a time is *not* permitted). Of course, fixing the parity bits is allowed after obtaining the random number. > > Would it be acceptable if I offer a patch adding this check to > __des3_ede_setkey() > and use that in the ccree driver? I am not sure it makes sense as the core requirement is the *one* invocation of the DRBG. Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
