Hello. On 04/20/2017 11:51 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
Define the generic R8A7743 part of the PFC device node. Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: renesas/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi =================================================================== --- renesas.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi +++ renesas/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* * Device Tree Source for the r8a7743 SoC * - * Copyright (C) 2016 Cogent Embedded Inc. + * Copyright (C) 2016-2017 Cogent Embedded Inc. * * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any @@ -123,6 +123,11 @@ #power-domain-cells = <1>; }; + pfc: pin-controller@e6060000 { + compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7743"; + reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>; + }; +I am curious to know why pin-controller was chosen rather than pfc which is dominant in the DT for Renesas SoCs.
The reason is simple: I was trying to follow the DT specs which require generic node names. The "pin-controller" looked more generic than "pfc".
And as a follow-up question, do you think it would be worth creating patches to make this uniform across the DT for Renesas SoCs.
Yes, probably. [...] MBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
