On 20-04-17, 10:43, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Just that the term performance is closely related to frequency, it needs > to be explicit on what *exactly* it means. As it stands now, > it can be used for OPP as I explain which controls both but as you > clarify that's not what it's designed for. We are talking about active states of a power domain here and *performance* is the best word I got. And yes we can still have frequency as a configurable here, just that current platforms don't have it. > I am not sure if choosing highest performance point makes it difficult > to fit it in regulator framework. It could be some configuration. I was just pointing out a difference :) > Also IIUC the actual programming is done in the firmware in this case > and I fail to see how that adds lot of platform code. Oh I meant that for converting general regulator only cases to OPP. No firmware was involved there. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
