On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 18:03 -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
> On 04/13/2017 08:48 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > This adds device tree binding documentation for mmio-based syscon
> > multiplexers controlled by a single bitfield in a syscon register
> > range.
>
> Nice! (you beat me to it, I was about to embark on this myself :)
>
> Looks good to me, just some minor comments below.
>
[...]
> > +Define a syscon bitfield to be used to control a multiplexer. The parent
> I think "Define a register bitfield to be used ..." is more clear.
[...]
> > +- compatible : "gpio-mux"
> Er, "mmio-mux"
I'll change those, thanks.
[...]
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + syscon {
> > + compatible = "syscon";
> > +
> > + mux: mux-controller@3 {
> > + compatible = "mmio-mux";
> > + reg = <0x3>;
> > + bit-mask = <0x1>;
> > + bit-shift = <5>;
> > + #mux-control-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + video-mux {
>
> I like this as an example consumer of a mmio-mux, but just
> the same some might argue this doesn't really fit here.
I don't think this is a problem, of course assuming that this video-mux
binding will actually come into existence.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
