Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: Document STM32 I2S bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hello Mark,

On 04/11/2017 11:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:44:52PM +0000, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:
>
>> However, regarding STM32 I2S driver, I'm wondering if selecting DAI
>> is the best way to configure interface as tx, rx or fd.
>
> Why do you even need to configure this?
>

The IP provides two data wires, SD in and SD out. So it can be 
configured either as capture or playback only, or full-duplex.
This corresponds to a mode selection through a register configuration.

>> Maybe, it is more relevant to configure DAI according to DMA
>> configuration from I2S node.
>> This would moreover avoid to allocate 2 dmas channels when not
>> necessary (tx or rx only).
>> If you agree with this, I will implement this change in a v2.
>
> That sounds wrong, I'd expect this wiring to be done statically as part
> of the .dtsi for the SoC (or just grabbed as needed at runtime if
> things are flexbile enough) rather than being a configuration thing done
> per board...  I had thought that this was configuration reflecting
> different ways of taping out the IP with different feature sets, is that
> not the case?
>

This configuration is board dependent. The IP may be used as rx, tx or 
fd depending on board. So I think it can make sense to have a DMA 
configuration linked to board, and to set IP mode accordingly.

BRs
olivier--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux