Hi Sakari,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 06 Apr 2017 16:12:06 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> OF and fwnode support are separated in V4L2 and individual drivers may
> implement one of them. Sub-devices do not match with a notifier
> expecting sub-devices with fwnodes, nor the other way around.
Shouldn't we instead convert all drivers to fwnode matching ? What's missing
after the mass conversion in patch 5/8 ?
> Fix this by checking for sub-device's of_node field in fwnode match and
> fwnode field in OF match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/media/v4l2-async.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c index 384ad5e..7f5d804 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> @@ -40,15 +41,34 @@ static bool match_devname(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> return !strcmp(asd->match.device_name.name, dev_name(sd->dev));
> }
>
> +static bool fwnode_cmp(struct fwnode_handle *one,
> + struct fwnode_handle *theother)
> +{
> + if (!one || !theother)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (one->type != theother->type)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (is_of_node(one))
> + return !of_node_cmp(of_node_full_name(to_of_node(one)),
> + of_node_full_name(to_of_node(theother)));
> + else
> + return one == theother;
> +}
> +
> static bool match_of(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> {
> - return !of_node_cmp(of_node_full_name(sd->of_node),
> - of_node_full_name(asd->match.of.node));
> + return fwnode_cmp(sd->of_node ?
> + of_fwnode_handle(sd->of_node) : sd->fwnode,
> + of_fwnode_handle(asd->match.of.node));
> }
>
> static bool match_fwnode(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_async_subdev
> *asd)
> {
> - return sd->fwnode == asd->match.fwnode.fwn;
> + return fwnode_cmp(sd->of_node ?
> + of_fwnode_handle(sd->of_node) : sd->fwnode,
> + asd->match.fwnode.fwn);
> }
>
> static bool match_custom(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_async_subdev
> *asd) diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> index 8f552d2..df8b682 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct v4l2_async_subdev {
> enum v4l2_async_match_type match_type;
> union {
> struct {
> - const struct device_node *node;
> + struct device_node *node;
That seems to be a bit of a hack :-( I'd rather make everything const and cast
to non-const pointers explicitly where the API requires us to. Or, better, add
a to_of_node_const() function.
> } of;
> struct {
> struct fwnode_handle *fwn;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
