Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of/pci: Fix memory leak in of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Bjorn,

On 04/05/2017 03:18 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Currently we only free the allocated resource struct when error.
This would cause memory leak after pci_free_resource_list.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v2:
Don't change the resource_list_create_entry's behavior.

  drivers/of/of_pci.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci.c b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
index 0ee42c3..a0ec246 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
@@ -190,8 +190,7 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev,
                         struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base)
  {
         struct resource_entry *window;
-       struct resource *res;
-       struct resource *bus_range;
+       struct resource res;
         struct of_pci_range range;
         struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
         char range_type[4];
@@ -200,24 +199,24 @@ int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev,
         if (io_base)
                 *io_base = (resource_size_t)OF_BAD_ADDR;

-       bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL);
-       if (!bus_range)
-               return -ENOMEM;
-
         pr_info("host bridge %s ranges:\n", dev->full_name);

-       err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev, bus_range);
+       err = of_pci_parse_bus_range(dev, &res);
         if (err) {
-               bus_range->start = busno;
-               bus_range->end = bus_max;
-               bus_range->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
-               pr_info("  No bus range found for %s, using %pR\n",
-                       dev->full_name, bus_range);
+               res.start = busno;
+               res.end = bus_max;
+               res.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
+               pr_info("  No bus range found for %s\n", dev->full_name);
         } else {
-               if (bus_range->end > bus_range->start + bus_max)
-                       bus_range->end = bus_range->start + bus_max;
+               if (res.end > res.start + bus_max)
+                       res.end = res.start + bus_max;
+       }
+       window = pci_add_resource(resources, NULL);
+       if (!window) {
+               err = -ENOMEM;
+               goto parse_failed;
         }
-       pci_add_resource(resources, bus_range);
+       *window->res = res;

Well, now this seems racy. You add a blank resource to the list first
and then fill it in.


Huh? There is absolutely no guarantees for concurrent access here.
pcI_add_resource_offset() first adds a resource and then modifies
offset. Here we add an empty resource and then fill it in.

I don't really like this pattern either.  Even if there's no actual
racy behavior, it takes more analysis than necessary to figure that
out.

pci_add_resource_offset() allocates a resource list entry, sets the
offset, then adds it to the list.  It doesn't update a resource entry
that might be visible to anybody else.  Here we do update a resource
that is already visible to others because it's already on the list.
i was following ./drivers/pnp/resource.c, but i'm agree this is not a good way.

i'll upload a new version to fix this in another way. more ideas:
1/ pass a struct device to of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources and use devm_kzalloc 2/ add a new type of flags(or reuse IORESOURCE_AUTO) to tell pci_free_resource_list to kfree them) 3/ add new helpers of of_pci_add_resource[_offset] to alloc empty res, fill it, add to list.

Bjorn

BTW, please CC linux-pci on the entire series so it's easier to
review.  I don't know where you envision having this applied, but I
only apply things to the PCI tree after they appear on linux-pci.

oh, sorry, didn't notice that, will do in next version.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux