Hello Rob, On 04/03/2017 11:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:25:31PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> The driver contains compatible strings for different models, but the DT >> binding doc only lists one of them. Add the remaining to the document. >> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/silead_gsl1680.txt | 7 ++++++- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > "dt-bindings: input: ..." is preferred for the subject, but no need to > respin just for that. > Can we document it in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt? I'm asking because is true that at the beginning we used "dt-bindings: foo" for all DT bindings patches but then many (most?) maintainers started asking for the subsystem subject line to be used for both drivers and DT bindings docs since they would be merging both and also they could miss the DT bindings patches if their subsystem prefix was not used. > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
