Hi, On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:44:29PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > This pull-request has the following two dependencies: > > - The first pull-request, i.e. [GIT PULL 1/2] ARM: imx: soc changes for 3.14 > > - The pinctrl 'devel' branch below. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel > > Linus Walleij promised that the branch will be stable at least from > the point I pulled into my tree, that is commit 31d610f (pinctrl: > imx1-core populate subdevices). > > Please pull, thanks. > > Shawn > > .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 3 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h | 494 +++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pingrp.h | 81 ++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27-pinfunc.h | 526 +++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27-pingrp.h | 151 ++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx35-pingrp.h | 104 +++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx50-pinfunc.h | 923 ++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx50-pingrp.h | 146 ++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-pingrp.h | 249 ++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-pingrp.h | 352 ++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-pinfunc.h | 2 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-pinfunc.h | 2 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-pingrp.h | 532 +++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl-pingrp.h | 148 ++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-pingrp.h | 127 +++ Hm, these don't quite use include files the way include files were originally meant to be used -- initially the idea was to use them to define mostly simple constants instead of full properties like this. I'm not against the idea of using it this way, but I also want to make sure the DT maintainers are OK with it. So I've cc:d them on this reply. I'm also not crazy about the insanely long identifiers used here, but I guess they correlate with some user manual tables? -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
