Hi Grant, Rob, On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:50:35 -0800, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [131122 17:16]: > > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [131122 17:09]: > > > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [131122 16:56]: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:43:35PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > + /* See of_device_resource_notify for populating interrupts */ > > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < num_irq; i++, res++) { > > > > > > > + res->flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ; > > > > > > > + res->start = -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > > > > > + res->end = -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > > > > > > > > > > NAK. Definitely a bad idea to start introducing magic values other into > > > > > > resources. Please don't do this. > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any better ideas on how to sort out this issue then? > > > > > > > > I guess we could allocate all the resources lazily here, I'll take a look > > > > at that. > > > > > > Here's a version that allocates the resources lazily with the notifier. > > > Seems to boot, need to play with it a bit more though to make sure we're > > > not overwriting resources for any legacy devices. > > > > Blurg. Using a notifier really feels like we don't have a good handle on > > a reasonable solution yet. Basically it means we're hooking into the > > driver core without /looking/ like we're hooking into the driver core. I > > don't think this is any better, but I don't have a better suggestion at > > the moment. :-( > > Unfortunately this patch, or something that accomplishes the same results, > is somewhat high-priority for us on OMAP. OMAP37xx got prematurely > converted to DT booting, and now dynamic power management is broken: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138658294830408&w=2 > > Tony writes that this patch is one of the two patches needed to get things > working again: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138660942506846&w=2 > > Is it possible to get this patch, or something similar, merged for > v3.13-rc? > > Once something like PM is broken, it's pretty easy for other broken > patches to make it into the tree, since it becomes very difficult to test > without turning into a maintainer denial-of-service attack. Ping. Could you please provide some guidance here about what you'd need to get this solved for v3.13-rc? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html