On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The fact that historically all the early adopters of pinctrl in device >> tree >> have these funky custom bindings is unfortunate but just something >> that we need to live with. >> > > To avoid any confusion, please bear with me and clarify this once and for > all, > since I'm not certain I fully got you here. > > Are you suggesting: > > 1) Use "pins" property with the currently implemented ABI (which slightly > differs > from the standard documented one as explained above. Not sure it is fine > overriding > it or not) Correction: you should be using the property "pinmux", because you are setting group and function at the same time. See for example: include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h And how that is used in: arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-pinfunc.h arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts The docs are here: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt65xx.txt I'm sorry that "pinmux" is not part of the generic documentation, it'd be great if you would like to add it with a patch. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
