On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 11:03:51 PM Leonard Crestez wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 10:04 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 22-03-17, 18:53, Leonard Crestez wrote: > > > If the cpufreq driver tries to modify voltage/freq during suspend/resume > > > it might need to control an external PMIC via I2C or SPI but those > > > devices might be already suspended. > > > > > > To avoid this scenario we just increase cpufreq to highest setpoint > > > before suspend. This issue can easily be triggered by ldo-bypass but in > > > theory any regulator set_voltage call can end up having to modify > > > external supply voltages. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The first couple of patches are obvious fixes despite being marked as > RFC. It would be great if you could apply them to your tree separately Why? > from the rest of the series but I'm not sure what the process is here. Well, you have to talk to me. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
