On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:46:47PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-03-27 15:06, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:17:48PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> Comparing a size_t with less than zero is always false as size_t > >> is unsigned. So, change the type of the variable to ssize_t and > >> replicate the size check from mux_configure_channel() into > >> mux_write_ext_info() thus ensuring that the size will fit in the > >> ssize_t variable. > >> > >> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1415278 ("Unsigned compared against 0") > >> > >> Fixes: 1da8e16d2812 ("iio: multiplexer: new iio category and iio-mux driver") > > > > You should fold this one and the next patch into the patches that they > > fix up instead fixing stuff that's not yet merged incrementally like you > > do here (specifically, the SHA id above will have no matching commit). > I forgot about that. And similar for the next patch. But how do you > propose that I attribute the reporters and CoverityScan? You can mention it in the cover letter and/or commit messages as you would for other kinds of review feedback. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html