On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Tobias Regnery <tobias.regnery@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24.03.17, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > >> > +static inline int of_n_addr_cells(struct device_node *np) >> > +{ >> > + return 0; >> > +} >> > + >> >> This looks good, but we should also do the same thing for of_n_size_cells(). >> >> I think I sent something like this a few years ago, but never resubmitted it >> when it was ignored at first. >> >> Arnd > > This seems sensible, I can send an updated patch with this change or I can > send it as a separate patch, whatever the maintainers prefer. I'd recommend sending an updated patch. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html