On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:02:13PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Power-domains need to express their active states in DT and what's > better than OPP table for that. > > This patch allows power-domains to reuse OPP tables to express their > active states. The "opp-hz" property isn't a required property anymore > as power-domains may not always use them. Then maybe you shouldn't be trying to make OPP table work here. At that point you just need a table of voltage(s) per performance state? > Add a new property "domain-performance-state", which will contain > positive integer values to represent performance levels of the > power-domains as described in this patch. Why not reference the OPP entries from the domain: performance-states = <&opp1>, <&opp2>; Just thinking out loud, not saying that is what you should do. The continual evolution of power (management) domain, idle state, and OPP bindings is getting tiring. > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
