Hi, On 23/03/2017 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers. >>> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though. >> >> I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner, >> as you will not end up with a long list. > > I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though, > like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc.. > But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax. > Hum. I don't really understand what you are saying.. Am I supposed to modify something or, is it okay and we're waiting for Lee to apply on his tree? Thanks in advance for clearing it up, Quentin -- Quentin Schulz, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
