On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 15.03.2017 um 20:57 schrieb Rob Herring: >> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 10:51:24PM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >>> Khadas is a new sub-brand of Shenzhen Wesion Technology CO.,LTD. They >>> are developing Amlogic and Rockchip based "DIY boxes" (single board >>> computers): http://khadas.com/ >>> They are best know for their latest product: the Khadas VIM (an Amlogic >>> GXL S905X based SBC). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Shouldn't the entry reflect what is in the commit message rather than > just repeat the prefix? I.e., something like "Khadas by Shenzhen Wesion > Technology Co., Ltd." (which I believe is the official spelling and > spacing of these abbreviations also for the commit message). I took the spelling for "Shenzhen Wesion Technology CO.,LTD." from their website: [0] > An Acked-by from the CC'ed vendor would also be desirable. :) I asked Gouwa, one of the people behind the Khadas VIM boards for clarification some time ago: "Khadas is a new brand power by Shenzhen Wesion Technology, 'Khadas' is brand, 'VIM' is product serial name, like 'Apple + iPhone'" I think I used the vendor-prefixes "pine64" and "radxa" as reference (see [1]) when I wrote the patch - and none of the existing entries seems to follow the "brand by parent company" schema. @Gouwa, Rob: could you please share your opinion on what the official "vendor" name for the "khadas" prefix should be? Regards, Martin [0] http://szwesion.com/contact/ [1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
