On 17-03-14 02:18 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Scott Branden
<scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 17-03-14 07:53 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/14/2017 01:26 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:58:29AM +0100, Rafa?? Mi??ecki wrote:
From: Rafa?? Mi??ecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
This adds baud rate, parity & number of data bits. It's required to get
serial working correctly.
Signed-off-by: Rafa?? Mi??ecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
index 8fd1ef9f0c2d..468107166a6f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm5301x.dtsi
@@ -18,8 +18,12 @@
/ {
interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+ aliases {
+ serial0 = &uart0;
+ };
+
chosen {
- stdout-path = &uart0;
+ stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
};
Hi Rafal
The alias is fine. But putting the stdout-path here is unusual. Which
serial port is used for console is board specific, where as
bcm5301x.dtsi is very generic, it describes the SoC, not a board. If
you look at other .dtsi files, those that specify stdout-path contain
properties which are common to a range of similar boards.
So far I've never seen any board using other uart. Also uart0 is disabled
by
default and we enable it per board family (BCM4708 / BCM47081 / BCM4709 /
BCM47094). I think it's just more practical to have simple DTS that
covers
99,9% boards by default and handled that margin of devices separately.
We already got a lot of duplicated code for enabling uart0, see:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7b790d3b2943bf8e7e7bafe184008bd6451fe0bd
Jon Mason from Broadcom who knows this hardware and designs very well
confirmed
it's a sane/safe assumption.
It should work for all the boards. The question is whether it should
be in the DTSI or DTS file. This code replicates code I have in
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm953012k.dts
So, either it should be removed or we should change all of the other
DTS files to have this entry. My understanding is that the latter
approach is the acceptable one (which matches Andrew's comment), but I
can make the other changes if necessary.
dtsi file is fine to handle 99% of the use cases and not duplicate the
entry. This is what we do for newer SoCs (such as Cygnus) where the console
will always be a particular UART (as the BootROM already uses a certain UART
the boards are designed to use that UART as the console always). For
bcm953012 a similar situation exists as a common bootloader is used across
boards. So, the uart used as the terminal will always be the same.
Unfortunately, there is not a common bootloader. CFE is used for the
4708/9 boards, and u-boot is used for the 5301x boards.
OK, little different situation not having a boot rom with console output
enforcing all designs to use the same UART.
Do both of the bootloaders happen to use the same UART and all the
boards are designed to use the same UART?
Thanks,
Jon
I don't see a good reason for duplicating the code in every dts file.
Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
