On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/14/2017 07:53 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:48 AM, David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> This patch applied to the GPIO tree, really simplistic so why not >> merge it. > > > I think the idea is that with Rob's Acked-by, it could be merged via the > GPIO tree when and if the other patches in the set are merged. Since I > don't maintain any trees pulled by Linus Torvalds, I am at the mercy of the > various maintainers. I agree that the code changes need to go in together. But DT bindings are sort of decoupled from the kernel i general (they are theoretically also used by other OSes such as *BSD) so they can be merged in an orthogonal manner once they are considered finished. No biggie for me though, if you prefer, I can pull it out. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
