On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:27:16PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: Hi Archit, > Hi, > > On 3/3/2017 9:27 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: > > The video processing pipeline on the second output on the GE B850v3: > > > > Host -> LVDS|--(STDP4028)--|DP -> DP|--(STDP2690)--|DP++ -> Video output > > > > Each bridge has a dedicated flash containing firmware for supporting the > > custom design. The result is that in this design neither the STDP4028 > > nor the STDP2690 behave as the stock bridges would. The compatible > > strings include the suffix "-ge-b850v3-fw" to make it clear that the > > driver is for the bridges with the firmware which is specific for the GE > > B850v3. > > > > The driver is powerless to control the video processing pipeline, as the > > two bridges behaves as a single one. The driver is only needed for > > telling the host about EDID / HPD, and for giving the host powers to ack > > interrupts. > > queued Patches 1,2 and 3 to drm-misc-next. Made stdp2690_get_edid static > in Patch #3 to fix a sparse warning. What about 4/4, aka the dt change? Do I need an ack from Rob Herring? Thanks a lot! [...] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
