RE: [RFC PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Add global SMR masking property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Thanks Robin,
This would be of great help.

Regards,
Nipun

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robin Murphy [mailto:robin.murphy@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 22:18
> To: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx>; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; stuyoder@xxxxxxxxx;
> Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Add global SMR masking property
> 
> On 02/03/17 04:18, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> >
> > Hi Robin/Will,
> >
> > This patch is currently not applied on the tree.
> > I had verified the patch and it seems good.
> > Is ack required on the patch or do I need to send a non RFC patch (with Robin's
> signoff)?
> > This is very much required to support SMMU on NXP platform.
> 
> It's still sat in my "patches to do something with" queue - I don't
> think we ever reached a concrete decision on the property name for a DT
> maintainer ack, but I've tweaked the description per Will's comment;
> thanks for the reminder. I'll send an rc1-based version out next week to
> reboot the discussion.
> 
> Robin.
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nipun
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Nipun Gupta
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 2:37
> >> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>; iommu@lists.linux-
> >> foundation.org; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; Stuart Yoder
> >> <stuart.yoder@xxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Add global SMR masking
> property
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: iommu-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:iommu-
> >>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Murphy
> >>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 18:49
> >>> To: iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> >> arm-
> >>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; Stuart Yoder
> >>> <stuart.yoder@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Subject: [RFC PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Add global SMR masking property
> >>>
> >>> The current SMR masking support using a 2-cell iommu-specifier is
> >>> primarily intended to handle individual masters with large and/or
> >>> complex Stream ID assignments; it quickly gets a bit clunky in other SMR
> >>> use-cases where we just want to consistently mask out the same part of
> >>> every Stream ID (e.g. for MMU-500 configurations where the appended TBU
> >>> number gets in the way unnecessarily). Let's add a new property to allow
> >>> a single global mask value to better fit the latter situation.
> >>>
> >>> CC: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Compile-tested only...
> >>>
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 8 ++++++++
> >>>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c                             | 4 +++-
> >>>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt
> >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt
> >>> index e862d1485205..98f5cbe5fdb4 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt
> >>> @@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ conditions.
> >>>                    aliases of secure registers have to be used during
> >>>                    SMMU configuration.
> >>>
> >>> +- stream-match-mask : Specifies a fixed SMR mask value to combine with
> >>> +                  the Stream ID value from every iommu-specifier. This
> >>> +                  may be used instead of an "#iommu-cells" value of 2
> >>> +                  when there is no need for per-master SMR masks, but
> >>> +                  it is still desired to mask some portion of every
> >>> +                  Stream ID (e.g. for certain MMU-500 configurations
> >>> +                  given globally unique external IDs).
> >>> +
> >>>  ** Deprecated properties:
> >>>
> >>>  - mmu-masters (deprecated in favour of the generic "iommus" binding) :
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> >>> index 8f7281444551..f1abcb7dde36 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> >>> @@ -1534,13 +1534,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_set_attr(struct
> >>> iommu_domain *domain,
> >>>
> >>>  static int arm_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args
> >> *args)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	u32 fwid = 0;
> >>> +	u32 mask, fwid = 0;
> >>>
> >>>  	if (args->args_count > 0)
> >>>  		fwid |= (u16)args->args[0];
> >>>
> >>>  	if (args->args_count > 1)
> >>>  		fwid |= (u16)args->args[1] << SMR_MASK_SHIFT;
> >>> +	else if (!of_property_read_u32(args->np, "stream-match-mask",
> >>> &mask))
> >>> +		fwid |= (u16)mask << SMR_MASK_SHIFT;
> >>>
> >>>  	return iommu_fwspec_add_ids(dev, &fwid, 1);
> >>>  }
> >>> --
> >>> 2.10.2.dirty
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> iommu mailing list
> >>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux