On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:22:13PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > I'm a bit worried by that to be honest. You claim to support the A31, > > yet jugdging by the current state of that code you never actually > > tested it on that SoC. > > > > What makes you say that the PRCM clocks are the same for the H3 and > > A64? We have to be sure, otherwise we might not be able to get the DT > > binding right from the very beginning, and we might not be able to fix > > it later. > > In fact, if we worry about this, we shouldn't make r-ccu, as > dedicated clocks are more easy to fix. > > For newer SoCs' PRCM, we never have enough documents, and Allwinner > have said that they cannot provide it. (I asked them for this.) > > The best solution is to implement mature enough dedicated clocks > before we convert to ccu. What do you mean by dedicated clocks? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
