Hi Hans-Christian, On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100 > > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: > >> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote: > >> >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni > >> >> > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > >> <snipp> > >> > >> >> >> If nobody complains about the 4.10 breakage, You'll have plenty of time > >> >> >> to remove it for 4.12 > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm fine with that, but I haven't put much effort into keeping it > >> >> > alive lately. If Hans-Christian agrees, I'm willing to post a patch to > >> >> > remove it, or ack someone else's patch. > >> >> > >> >> Then lets plan this for 4.12, either you Håvard whip up a patch or I can > >> >> eventually do it. > >> >> > >> >> I can push it through the linux-avr32 git tree on kernel.org. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Can you do that just after 4.11-rc1 is released and provide a topic > >> > branch I can pull in my nand/next branch, so that I can rework this > >> > patch and drop all the pdata-compat code (as suggested by Andy). > >> > >> OK, I will try to prepare it during the weekend. > >> > >> Any reason to wait for 4.11-rc1? AFAIK Linus prefers the larger changes > >> before he starts tagging rc's. > >> > > > > Oh, so you want to queue it for 4.11, that's even better. > > Perhaps I misunderstood you, by after 4.11-rc1 you mean queue it for 4.12? > > I will see what I get around to do in the weekend, it should be pretty > straightforward, just want to make sure we remove all the bits. > Any progress on this? I plan to send a new version of this series soon and I'd like to know if I should drop pdata/avr32 support or not. Note that I'm targeting 4.12, so, as long as you drop avr32 support in 4.12 we should be good. Thanks, Boris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html