On 28 February 2017 at 21:31, Jon Mason <jon.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -70,10 +70,19 @@
> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> };
>
> - local-timer@20600 {
> + timer@20600 {
Is there a reason for this rename? I don't really have preference for
any name, it's just we shouldn't keep renaming this depending of
personal preferences.
It also doesn't seem like adjusting to any schema:
bcm63138.dtsi uses local-timer@1e600
bcm-nsp.dtsi uses twd-timer@20600
berlin2cd.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
berlin2.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
berlin2q.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
> - reg = <0x20600 0x100>;
> - interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + reg = <0x20600 0x20>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
> + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> + clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> + };
The rest looks OK, thanks! :)
--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
