Re: [PATCH 1/1] devicetree: of_node_put() does not require holding devtree_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Frank,

Frank Rowand wrote:
Adding Rob.

On 02/22/17 01:29, Sakari Ailus wrote:
While holding a reference to a device_node it is allowed to put that node
without holding devtree_lock spinlock. Move of_node_put() after releasing
the spinlock.

Please explain why the change fixes or improves the code.  In other words,
what is the point of the change?

The spinlock is simply not needed, that's all. I'd say generally moving code that does not require serialising out of a serialised section does improve the code, sometimes also the readability of the code, especially if it doesn't get more complicated as a result.


Please use getmaintainer to find who to send the patch to.

I'll do that the next time.

--
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux